Showing posts with label Sense and Sensibility. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Sense and Sensibility. Show all posts

Sunday, November 20, 2022

Sense and Sensibility Play Review


This two-hour adaptation was inspired by Jane Austen and Emma Thompson's wonderful screenplay. It emphasizes the comedy but without losing the essence of the story. The script even uses Jane's own words in parts. The narrator is portrayed by seven actors portraying gossips. Perhaps they're servants, perhaps neighbors. They relay pertinent information such as Mr. Dashwood's death and how that affects the ladies and why. I appreciated the explanation for those who may not know the story as well as I do. 

The actors mostly all play multiple roles regardless of gender. Elinor and Marianne are the only two who don't play more than one part. The costumes took some getting used to. They're meant to be silly and over-the-top for the most part. The gossips wear their undergarments on the outside and not specifcially period undergarments but period inspired : fancy Victorian style corsets and panniers; some wore more modern clothing and the Dashwood sisters wore sort of prom dresses with Elinor changing outer robes to mimic the Regency style. 


The gossips talk really fast and over one another sometimes. I found it difficult to understand them at first. I also found it hard to understand Marianne in the beginning. She speaks very fast. The Dashwood sisters in this production are Latina and refer to each other as "querida", a Spanish term of endearment. I thought that was very sweet and added an extra element to the love story between the two sisters. The play is pretty faithful to the novel. Of course a lot is removed for time constraints but when time passes, the gossips prance around on stage with hand painted signs stating "time passes" or "One month later." I would recommend they slow down and show the signs to the whole audience because people sitting around me had trouble seeing them and I couldn't see what was on one sign. It's not super important but for those who don't know the story, they might want to know time is passing!

This adaptation discusses sense vs. sensibility and keeps the sisters' personalities and conversations mostly in tact. Marianne is a lover of nature, poetry, plain speaking and is a whirlwind of energy. Elinor is not as patient as she is in the novel. Sometimes she sounded on the verge of losing her temper with her sister instead of keeping all her feelings tramped down. 

Mrs. Dashwood is reduced to only a few scenes in which she is idle and eating biscuits from a tin. Margaret, portrayed by a petite woman, is very cute. She gives the impression of youth by her dialogue- wanting to see puppies and teasing her sisters about their beaux. F- his name begins with an F! I completely believed she was a child. The other two sisters I felt didn't quite click with their characters as much but I couldn't see either of them trading roles.


Sir John Middleton and Mrs. Jennings pop in and out with their customary energy and loudness. Sir John is portrayed as somewhat effeminate. Watch for his hounds because I nearly died laughing. The actors nailed bad dog behavior. Look down on the floor and watch the hounds and not the people. Trust me! Unless you don't like doggy antics. They only appear twice. Mrs. Jennings is a loud, nosy gossip just as she is in the book. The actress is small but her hat gives her the impression of being a larger older woman. Lady Middleton appears in a few scenes played by a different person each time. She hides under a mop of curly hair and offers little to the conversation. As in Emma Thompson's version, her annoying children are left out of the story. 

Lucy and Anne Steele are played by members of the company who also portray gossips. Lucy wears undergarments as clothes but Anne is played by a male actor in non-Regency female attire and a wig. Anne is hilariously stupid and Lucy is a little less catty than in the novel. She prefers more direct confrontation, getting up in Elinor's face. Her secret is revealed much sooner than it is in the novel and so poor Elinor suffers longer. Poor Edward is drawn from Hugh Grant's portrayal. He's shy, awkward, bumbling and can't always spit out the right words and his poetry recital does not meet with Marianne's approval. (FYI: Jane Austen's favorite poet, Cowper, is pronounced like Cooper.) 

The finale was inspired by Emma Thompson's with a really funny twist. Edward seems to have been evesdropping on other gentlemen of our aquaintance. I think I was the only one who picked up on that, at least enough to guffaw loudly. 

Col. Brandon was the most believable and true to the original. He was the straight man to the comedic extras. Even though the actor played multiple roles, I feel he was best as Col. Brandon. I had forgotten he was also a gossip, the characters were as opposite as Elinor and Marianne. The same actor also played Thomas, the servant at the end of the story who provides some gossip that finally makes Elinor break down. Again, the actor was transformed into a totally new person. For some reason, the story of Col. Brandon's lost love was changed and the name of her daughter was also changed. It's a shorter explanation but doesn't quite make as much sense as the original plot. Also, where's the duel between Col. Brandon and Willougby? GONE!

Fanny and John Dashwood are played for laughs. He's a foppish man in 1970s clothing who loves his wife and gets turned on by her nastiness. She manages to convince him not to do anything for his sisters. It's a shorter speech than in the novel but conveys the same meaning. The actress also played a gossip and there was little distinction between them. The scene where Fanny learns of Lucy's secret is a full on fight scene! It's different but funny. No Regency lady would behave in such a manner though.

The actor portraying John Dashwood also plays Willoughby. He's handsome and smarmy, not as charming as the original. His story is tweaked slightly to make him more caddish. He even shows up at Marianne's near deathbed totally drunk. Marianne is informed of his perfidy shortly after that. 

One scene I especially liked was the masquerade ball in London where Marianne is searching for Willoughby before she finally sees him. The music sounded appropriate and the dance looked inspired by the movie version of 19th-century dancing. I think the soundtrack was courtesy of Bridgerton soundtrack stars Vitamin String Quartet or someone similar. I recognized pop music in the faster piece they danced to. Regency Lady Gaga anyone? The scene, where Marianne refuses to dance, effectively conveys her distress and obsession with Willoughby.

The sets were very simple but fancy wasn't necessary. I liked the piano painted onto a box. It worked just fine. The magic of theater is using your imagination and let the acting and dialogue weave a spell around you.

I saw the show in previews and it had a few kinks to work out but overall is ready for an audience to come and be entertained.

Tuesday, May 28, 2013

Movie Review

Movie Review 

From Prada to Nada

starring Camilla Belle and Alexa Vega


Sisters Nora (Camilla Belle) and Mary (Alexa Vega) Dominguez live a lavish life in Beverly Hills with their adoring and energetic dad. When he dies unexpectedly, family secrets are revealed. First, Nora and Mary have an illegitimate half brother Gabriel and second, their father left them with nothing. Gabriel and his greedy wife Olivia buy the Dominguez family home and allow the sisters to live there until they're ready to move, as Fanny Dashwood does in the original. When the situation becomes intolerable, the girls move in with their aunt in East LA. East LA is a world apart from Beverly Hills and at first the girls feel uncomfortable. They don't speak Spanish and the culture of the hood is very different from Beverly Hills. Nora adapts quickly and enjoys helping the poor immigrants fight corporate America with the help of her handsome boss and sister-in-law's brother, Edward Ferris (Nicholas D'Agosto). She tries to fight her growing attraction to Edward and stick to her 10 year career plan. Mary wants nothing more than to go back to Beverly Hills. She fears Bruno (Wilmer Valdereama), a local boy (alias Colonel Brandon) who is always hanging around (wearing hoodies instead of flannel waistcoats). She sees her chance to get her old life back with her sexy literature TA. She gains a new appreciation for Mexican culture through the poetry Rodrigo teaches but still thinks she can have it all until one fateful night that changes everything.

I can't really comment on the plot without spoilers so be forewarned. Jane Austen would not recognize this story. Her story really doesn't translate well to a direct plot to plot retelling. This movie cuts out the subplot about Eliza and Lucy is introduced after Edward declares his feelings for Nora. The girls are not so much sense and sensibility as nerdy and ditzy. Mary is in the model of Cher from Clueless while Nora is intelligent and career-driven. Normally I would rejoice in a heroine like Nora, but contrasted with Mary she becomes dowdy and awkward. She's boiled down to a stereotypical nerd with more interest in books than boys. I would have liked her to be sexy and smart and have Mary not be so stereotypical Beverly Hills socialite. I do like how Mary grows and learns to be more like Nora, but in the short time allotted (the movie is under two hours), her development is very quick. Edward is a great character but not developed very well either. He's a perfect hero in every way until he meets Lucy. Then there's a gaping plot hole that doesn't make any sense whatsoever and isn't even explained. Rodgrigo is easy to pin down for anyone who knows the story. I wondered how they would handle him and I guessed his secret. Bruno is the Colonel Brandon character. He reveals hidden depths but his character isn't developed enough and the romance at the end is too rushed to make a lot of sense. 

I like the Mexican culture aspects, but it seemed very stereotypical to me. Beverly Hills is also portrayed stereotypically. Maybe LA actually is like that?

This is a cute, fluffy movie that's good for a flight or a fun summer date with the TV. I wouldn't pay to watch it.

Saturday, February 23, 2013

What I've Read This Week

What I've Read This Week . . .


Mr. Darcy Forever by Victoria Connelly -- Austenesque/ Contemporary Romance/Women's Fiction

Sarah and Mia Castle are sisters and the best of friends. They are complete opposites. Little sister Mia is messy, impulsive, romantic and dreams of being an actress. Older sister Sarah is neat, cautious and worries about everything. She uses her OCD to control her surroundings when things don't go her way. She springs for a magical dream vacation to celebrate Mia's 21st birthday at Barton Cottage, the Dashwoods cottage in the Emma Thompson/Ang Lee version of Sense and Sensibility. It's supposed to be a girls' week away from men and everything else wrong with their lives, but when handsome neighbor Alec rescues Mia from a fall, all their plans are forgotten. Three years later, the sisters are not speaking to each other. They haven't seen each other since not long after their vacation to Barton Cottage. Something happened that drove them apart. Sarah can't help but worry about her little sister so she decides to head to Bath for the Jane Austen Festival in hopes of reuniting with her sister. She's worried her sister won't want to see her, but with some encouragement from a new friend, she proceeds with her plan. Mia's life isn't going so well. Her dream of becoming an actress is becoming harder and harder to achieve. She's looking forward to this weekend in Bath with her good friend Shelley. Shelley fears Mia has changed and she's determined to get to the reason why. She also wants to play matchmaker for her handsome yet, older neighbor Gabe.  Mia fears she'll never find her Mr. Darcy. Has fiction ruined her for life? This story is a modern retelling of Sense and Sensibility without the social etiquette of the original. Thus, it's an incredibly predictable, boring story about two obnoxious grown women acting like teenagers. I could easily figure out what was going to happen based on the plot of Sense and Sensibility and waiting for it to happen was like waiting for a disaster. None of the main characters are redeemable. Sarah's OCD is out of control and she doesn't even consider trying to get help. The only time she's not obsessive compulsive is when it's convenient to the plot, which I thought wasn't very accurate. . Her OCD keeps her from functioning like a normal human and it's both tragic and annoying to read about her quirks and obsessing over every possible thing that could go wrong. If she's really so OCD, I doubt she'd ever want to get married. Mia is even more silly and impulsive than Marianne and she behaves very very badly. I didn't like her behavior or anything else about her except she's a Janeite. The leading men are too perfect. They don't resemble the flawed Austen heroes at all, except for the obvious parallel to a character in Sense and Sensibility. The best part of this book was the descriptions of the festival and Bath. The festival sounds like a lot of fun and I wish more time had been spent on the activities rather than flashing back to past events just when the fun was about to start. This book is the weakest in the trilogy. You don't necessarily have to read the first two but if you plan to, read those first because this one contains spoilers. 

Ransome's Honor by Kaye Dacus -- Inspirational Regency Romance

Julia Witherington, daughter of a naval officer and newly minted baronet, has had a crush on her father's lieutenant William Ransome since she was 10. She's now seventeen and ready to marry, but when William doesn't propose, Julia is heartbroken. William refuses to take advantage of his patron's generosity and take Julia's dowry for his own. He's determined to make his own way in the world. Julia returns to her family's home in Jamaica, where she runs the plantation with precision. Thirteen years later, Julia is in England once more. Her life has changed dramatically in the passing years with the deaths of her twin brother and her mother and the subsequent move to England. Julia enjoys getting to know her father better but can't help but be jealous of his devotion to the Navy. She also does not like her chaperone, her aunt, Lady Pembroke, who doesn't approve of mere sailors. William Ransome, now a Captain, has returned to England now peace has come. While he waits for his ship to be refitted, her stays with family at the home his closest friend Collin, Captain Yates. Collin's wife Susan is Julia's dearest friend, and thus they are thrown together once again.  

If Julia doesn't marry by her 30th birthday next month, she'll receive her inheritance in full. Julia is determined to return to Jamaica and live her life freely, as she chooses. Julia's aunt has other ideas about Julia's fortune. She hatches a plan that is utterly disagreeable to Julia and threatens the honor of the Witherington name if Julia doesn't comply. With her father away on business, Julia turns to the only person she knows can help, William Ransome. Julia proposes a business arrangement marriage of convenience to her former love. He's not so sure he wants to be married. His devotion is to the Navy and nothing else, but yet, he can't help wanting to protect Julia. Julia is determined not to fall in love with William all over again. She feels he used her only to get close to her father, but she can't help but begin to feel the stirrings of her heart once again.

This story is a rewrite of Persuasion, my favorite Austen novel, so I couldn't wait to read it. Unfortunately, it didn't meet my expectations. The plot was full of gaping holes that didn't make much sense. Honor is overemphasized in the plot to a ridiculous degree. I didn't believe any of the reasons characters invoked honor to do something stupid. Julia is also of age and no one can force her to do anything. Even if rumors are spread, it's pretty obvious that soon everyone will know Julia was the wronged party so her actions are not justified. The romance was a bit hollow too. It's supposed to be a slow burn but never fully develops and is rushed at the end. It leaves room for development in the sequels, I suppose, but it wasn't the ending I hoped for. The characters are all pretty bland. Not one of them is memorable. Julia is whiny and easily persuadable. William is too stiff and they're both too proud. The villains are typical stock villains of this sort of novel. The only character I found interesting is Charlotte Ransome, William's headstrong sister. I didn't like her enough to want to read her book (#2 in the trilogy). It's pretty obvious what is going to happen. This is supposed to be an inspirational novel, but it's pretty tame on the religious end of things. The characters pray for guidance one in awhile but they take responsibility for their own actions, which pleased me. If you like this sort of novel, try Regina Scott's Everard Legacy and other inspirational novels instead.